As shown in my previous blog, speech
problems can be a precursor of dyslexia. Some may be caused by
hearing-processing in the brain. Some may have roots in inner-ear problems,
such as fluid or infections. But again, have hope. True phonics can heal most speech
obstacles.
Young Isaac couldn’t hear well
until his adenoids were removed. By then, he was far behind in his speech. So
his mom used The Godfrey Method picture-letter phonics-cards to help him learn
sounds, to talk, and to bring him up to speed. He has progressed very quickly,
which surprised his doctors!
In his article, Dyslexia: The Disease You Get in School,
Dr. Blumenfeld quotes parts of the Academic American Encyclopedia (Vol. 6,
page 320). “Clinical definitions of dyslexia include an impaired ability to
read or comprehend what’s read. The term “specific dyslexia” refers to the
inability to read in a person of normal or high general intelligence whose
learning is not impaired by socioeconomic deprivation, emotional disturbance,
or brain damage.
Psychologists disagree about whether specific dyslexia is a
clearly identifiable syndrome. Those who do, note that it persists into
adulthood, tends to run in families, and occurs more frequently in males*. It
is also associated with a specific kind of difficulty in identifying words and
letters, which dyslexics tend to reverse or invert. Although there is
disagreement among “experts” over the causes of dyslexia, there is general
agreement that the most effective “cure” is remedial programs that stress
phonics.”
The encyclopedia above and other
experts mistakenly deny that speech problems are often related to dyslexia. The
scientific data proves otherwise.
However, we’ve known the
specific cause of dyslexia since 1929 when neurology physician, Dr. Samuel T.
Orton (a leading brain specialist), wrote his article for the Journal of
Educational Psychology, The ‘Sight
Reading’ Method of Teaching Reading as a Source of Reading Disability. His
warning to educators was quite explicit: this method of teaching will harm a
large number of children.
What did the university educators,
professors with the power to change textbooks and policy, do with this truth?
They responded negatively to his findings, actually accelerating the
introduction and promotion of the new sight-reading methods across America.
It
didn’t take long before America began to have a reading problem. Although Dr.
Orton developed one of the most effective remediation techniques, the
Orton-Gillingham method, his 1929 article is noticeably missing from the
dyslexia literature.
You may ask why I care about
such an old study? Truth does not change. Truth may go out of style, but it
does not change. Others may hawk some new theory as true, but time always shows
the unchangeable truth. What Dr. Orton said in 1929 is still true today.
Others have raised the warning
flag only to be ignored, or worse, attacked. In 1955 Dr. Rudolf Flesch
published, Why Johnny Can’t Read,
written specifically to let parents know the true cause of the reading problem.
He wrote, “The teaching of reading – all over the United States, in all
schools, and in all textbooks – is totally wrong and flies in the face of all
logic and common sense.”
Naturally, the educators rejected Flesch’s assertions.
Again, “educators” refers to those in power, those who gain money or prestige
from publishing new methods. The average teacher is usually a concerned
individual, but can’t teach our children properly until the universities change
what they teach the teachers to teach.
Dr. Blumenfeld raised the truth
yet again in his 1973 book, The New
Illiterates. Not long after, the home-school movement began to swell, and
most proponents wisely use phonics with their children.
Teaching sight-reading uses
word-recognition strategies based on putting sight-words in shape-frames, loading
the pages with illustrations for each word, having context clues in absurd
stories, guessing by context, and phonetic clues (not phonics) for initial and
final consonants. Is it any wonder that this causes dyslexia in normal
children?
Dyslexia
may run in families not because of genetics (other than hearing-processing), but because their parents were
taught sight-reading and don’t know how to teach them otherwise. This mass of
confusion has been going on for generations. Educators keep changing its name
and pushing it again.
By the
word-shape worksheet below, it could also be book, back, and a myriad of other
words. What a mass of confusion! Speech is hearing; reading should teach the precise sounds of each letter and
letter-blend. Reading should be hearing with your eyes, mapped on the left side
of your brain. Right-brained sight-reading destroys true understanding,
literacy, and self-esteem.
Do you remember that alleged study
by Cambridge that tried to justify sight-reading? See http://scienceavenger.blogspot.com/2007/12/cambridge-word-scramble-study-its-fake.html
Cambridge Word Scramble Study: It's Fake Already!
“It
seems the bogus "Cambridge University Study" concerning shuffled
words is making the rounds again, and this is one bit of crapola I never tire
of debunking. Here is a typical [email] depiction:
"From
Cambridge University:
“Olny srmat poelpe can raed
tihs. I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny
iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The
rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is
bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a
wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! If you
can raed tihs psas it on!!!"
“That this piece of obvious
claptrap continues to impress is testimony not only to the ever-sagging
education level of Americans, but also to our ever-growing anti-intellectualism
that gives more and more benefit of the doubt to anything that promises to validate
ignorance and basic intellectual laziness. It is flawed in every way. I've
never been able to confirm that such a study was ever done at Cambridge, but if
it was, and this description accurately portrayed their findings, everyone
associated with the study out to be booted from serious intellectual circles.
“If we truly read words as a
whole, then why must the first and last letters be fixed? Why can't the entire
word be scrambled? And what exactly does "as a whole" mean anyway?
How can one see a word as a whole without seeing the letters in it? [A phonics
reader doesn’t understand a sight-reader’s lack of understanding.]
“In a way this is a cheap
magician's trick, because the only reason people can read the scrambled words
is because they aren't very scrambled. Fixing the first and last letters means
2 and 3 letter words don't change at all, and 4 letter words just swap the
middle letters. That's the bulk of our vocabulary. Try making a sentence with
very long words, and our ability to read words "as a whole"
mysteriously vanishes. To wit:
““Bblaaesl pryleas pnmrrioefg
sllaimy aeoulltsby dvrseee clbrpmaaoe tteenmrat,” is incomprehensible, because
now every word is truly scrambled, with the first and last letters being an
insignificant proportion of the total. So sorry all of you that thought you had
academic backing to your poor spelling and grammar skills. They do matter,
because baseball players performing similarly [poorly] absolutely deserve
comparable treatment [disgust].”
POSTED BY
SCIENCEAVENGER AT 12:51 PM, SUNDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2007
I might add that it is slow and
tedious to figure out the fake Cambridge sentence the sight-reading way,
whereas reading by phonics is efficient and immediately understandable. How
would you rather read every day? Slow guessing game or efficiently precise?
When the best practice of
millennia (phonics) is available, why do we keep pushing the handicap? Leave it
for deaf children – where something is better than nothing, and hearing-processing
doesn’t have much real estate in their brain neuron-mapping. Don’t you want
your child to pronounce words more precisely than a deaf child?
We make
understandable concessions for deaf people, but they're not for everyone else. Should
we teach our children to read by Braille, even though they can see, just
because blind people do? Absurd. To be taken seriously as an adult, your child
needs to be articulate ~ in speaking, reading and writing.
Dyslexia is a visual-confusion
problem caused by sight-words and a hearing-processing problem in brain
neurons. Dyslexia itself is not truly genetic, and its biological roots can be
healed with phonics. So why does dyslexia seem to run in families? Well, if
parents learned sight-reading and struggled, they can't easily teach their own
children properly with phonics. So the induced-confusion continues another
generation.
Again, if your baby can read by
sight-words now, he'll probably struggle with reading later. Turn off the noise
and electronics. Hold your toddler and read to him. Introduce her to early
phonics the right way. Let them become all they can be.
Teach Your Child to Read in 100 Easy Lessons, by Siegfried Engelmann, Phyllis Haddox, & Elaine
Bruner
Alpha-Phonics: A Primer for Beginning Readers, by Samuel L. Blumenfeld
Alpha-Phonics Audio Lessons - Pronunciation CD Rom
The Victims of Dick and Jane, by Samuel L. Blumenfeld
The
Whole Language/Obe Fraud: The Shocking Story of How America Is Being Dumbed
Down by Its Own Education System, by Samuel L. Blumenfeld
SYMPTOMS OF DYSLEXIA
What are the symptoms of
dyslexia, and how are they related to sight-reading? In Smart But Feeling Dumb, Dr. Harold N. Levinson wrote them as:
- Memory instability for letters, words, or numbers
- A tendency to skip over or scramble letters, words, and sentences
- Poor, slow, fatiguing reading ability prone to compensatory head tilting, near-far focusing and finger pointing
- Reversal of letters such as b, d, words such as saw and was, and numbers such as 6 and 9 or 16 and 61. (We teach math, now, the way we teach reading. More in Chapter 10.)
- Poor spelling [Dr. Blumenfeld, et al]
These are the same mistakes made
by any child trying to learn a vocabulary by sight. It is obvious that if you look
at each word as a picture, you can look at it from right to left or upside down
as easily as from left to right or right-side up. The sequence of letters seems
arbitrary with no rhyme or reason. Yet to a phonetic reader, the sequence of
letters is most important because it
is the same sequence that the sounds are uttered. Consider some more
interesting reasons that sight-words cause confusion for young readers:
- Sight words are hieroglyphics - large hieroglyphics.
- Sight-readers need to memorize 4,000 - 5,000 words by shape just to read the newspaper. Even the Chinese have this problem with their hieroglyphics. Whereas, phonics only requires learning about 46 sounds to decode almost any word, increasing vocabulary by 100-fold. Translating Chinese and Japanese by their sounds into alphabetic words makes them so much easier to learn. Everyone can understand!
- As grown-ups, sight-readers easily confuse Perdition, Pandemonium, Purgatory, and Paradise (see Cathy Froggatt’s article*). They each begin with the same letter and are long words, plus somewhat related in meaning. Yet a 6-year-old phonics reader can sound them out easier and accurately.
- "Context" would not necessarily help sight-readers decipher the words in cases like the above, yet the word choice changes the whole meaning of the sentence (see *Whole Language at the Fork in the Road, by Cathy Froggatt – the funniest, most true, and best satire on Whole Language)!
- To a child, sight words and their letters are 3-dimensional, like a dog, the same backwards and forwards and upside-down. Like, cab, bac(k); bad, dab, dad; there, their; your, you’re.
- Sight words = reversed letters, reversed order. This is not genetic; it's because sight-words as hieroglyphics don't have any chronological order in a child's mind. A dog is a dog, no matter which way it's turned. Not knowing the individual letter sounds, sight readers don't understand the sound sequence in the word. Palindromes might be the only safe words for sight-readers to learn! Like level, kayak, radar, noon, madam, civic, etc.
- Sight words = limited reading ability, not able to deconstruct sounds. As adults, sight-readers come across unfamiliar words and have to guess in front of others. It's embarrassing!
- Sight words = increase in speech problems, too. Children who already struggle with processing sounds in their brain are given a bigger handicap with sight words. Only phonics can cure this. Yes, speech problems and dyslexia can be cured with phonics!
- Phonics wires neurons on the left [hearing] brain-hemisphere; whereas sight-words wire them on the right [seeing] brain-hemisphere defectively.
- Originally, the invention of phonics advanced independent thought like never before. It's true! The creation of symbols for each sound, instead of symbols for whole words, made reading available to the whole population, not just the educated scholars, scribes, and priests. This opened up the exchange of ideas like no other in history. (The printing press would have been impossible later without individual phonics letters, too.)
- Any lab monkey can learn a few sight words: food, water, cage, let, me, out! Don't we want our children to be smarter than lab monkeys? Then they have to read better than monkeys, too.
- A parrot can learn to talk, but he does not understand his own sentences. Word-shape-induced dyslexia does the same for reading.
- Homonyms and changing short vowels to long vowels are difficult. It is hard for sight-readers to distinguish homonyms like fail, fell, and feel; Brian from Brain, cut from cute, etc. Phonics readers understand the sequential chronology of the sounds as well as the affects of silent letters and blends. Homonyms become much easier, too.
- What about "ough" words? To a non-sequential reader, “ought” and “tough” are basically the same word. So are “though” and “through”. There are a whole lot more of these types of confusions with sight-reading.
- Father vs. Daddy in context. Sometimes the choice of the word makes all the difference to the flavor of the sentence. Context might have a child say daddy for father, but this doesn't usually work well. What about when there is no context? Like signs? Single words?
- Is love evol (evil)? Is a star pupil the same as lip-up rats? Not only do sight-readers read words backwards, but whole sentences backwards or scrambled as well. What about when earshot becomes shot ears? Word order in a sentence changes its meaning, too. “So much depends...” vs. “…depends much; so?” or “Buy a fat pig” vs. “Pig fat a buy!” And palindrome sentences, “Eros, eyesore?” (from The Poisonwood Bible, by Barbara Kingsolver). See how the meaning changes just by word order? And more by letter order? Now put those two confusions together. The sight-reader may be reading a very different book than the author wrote!
- My sister-in-law has a tole-painted sign on wooden blocks. Together the two blocks say, “The best things in life, are not things.” My middle son put the bottom block on top so that it said, “Are not things, the best things in life?” He thought he was so clever! See how word order changes meaning? How about celebrated Bible misprints, like when John 5:14 was printed as “Sin on more” instead of “Sin no more”? Talk about a change of meaning!
- Numbers and letters mix-up. Phonics readers usually do not mix up letters with numbers. But many sight-readers do. The math sum, 800+5, may look like "Boots" to a child who has learned the confusing word-shape way. I've seen it happen. Sight-reading, for some reason, makes it harder to distinguish 1 and I; 2 and Z; 3 and E; 4 and A or h; 5 and S; 6 and G; 7 and T or L; 8 and B; 9 and g; 0 and O, etc.
- Clairebella = sister. My friend, Danielle, began teaching her son, Jaksen, some sight-words because his preschool used them. Suddenly he started mixing up things like never before. When she would show him the name Clairebella, he would say, “sister”. He related the look of that word correctly to his sister, but didn't understand the sounds in the word or why that was wrong. Contextually, he was correct. He also started mixing his letters and numbers, which he didn’t do before the sight-word lessons. Luckily, his mom started over with The Godfrey Method phonics to re-wire his brain on the proper hemi for reading!
Why do we want to dumb-down our
children with sight-reading and induced dyslexia? Yes, I said induced. Going
back to hieroglyphics is going backwards. Do we want backwards children in a
backwards society? Who does this benefit? I came across some teaching aids
called, “Word Shape Worksheets,” (below) and I almost choked. Their purpose is
to help children memorize the outlined shape of words. If teachers only
understood how much damage they are doing with these kinds of hieroglyphic exercises!
Without the accuracy of
individual letter sounds, boots, beets, & beats, all have the same shape.
So do beast and boost. How about boosts and beasts? Worse yet is confusing
letters with numbers. To a young child, 5+337 could be STEEL. It’s obvious why
induced-dyslexia causes major spelling problems.
Another symptom of sight-reading
is behavioral problems. Studies of children with reading disabilities show the
effects of induced-dyslexia on the personality and behavior of the child. Many
children exhibit conduct disorders, undesirable reactions, and confused
frustration. Dr. Orton found that, “Faulty teaching methods may not only
prevent the acquisition of academic education by children of average capacity,
but may also give rise to far reaching damage to their emotional life.” (Average
capacity means NOT dumb.)
*Did you know that there is a
world-wide gender gap in reading, especially with whole language or
sight-reading methods? Science has shown that boys are very different from
girls in fetal development, emotional response, brain differentiation, and
such. The multi-focus teaching methods above favor girls in academic
achievement. However, when the single-focus approach of systematic phonics is
used, the sex differences are eliminated, with the boys even outperforming the
girls, sometimes.
A few years ago I read a Reader’s
Digest® article which reported that, in general, we are losing our boys in
education. They keep falling further behind. The article didn’t make the
connection between teaching methods and learning difficulties, but we do. So,
knowing that more boys fall behind with whole language and other sight-reading
methods, a wise parent will make sure that her son has systematic, synthetic
phonics taught as his method of reading! Since reading is the foundation of
everything else, he will have a much better chance to be his best self, even bright
or gifted. Daughters, too!
Thus sight-reading is not only a
serious handicap to school performance, but also to wholesome personality
development, which is significant. What child feels good about going to
resource (remedial) class? What child is proud to tell his friends? Quite the
opposite. Kids can be cruel with teasing. Children often feel stupid when
they’re not, deeply harming their self-esteem, perhaps for life. Experiments
have proven that such children can be trained to read properly with adequate phonics
methods, which eradicate the confusion and related behavioral problems.
“The road to literacy is not an
easy one, even with the best phonics program [pre-TGM]. How much harder it must
be with sight words!” Samuel L. Blumenfeld in, Children Taught With Look-Say Method Lack All Sense of Precision of
Letters.
Why teach a child to read
defectively on purpose? Sight-reading takes normal children and teaches them to
read like handicapped children. It's not genetic. It gets harder each year in
school as s/he falls further and further behind. Your Baby Can Read is the epitome of the causes of dyslexia and may
prove to be worse for our children than the Whole Language fiasco.
Now that you know the “emperor
has no clothes” (see Vol. 5 of It's Not Rocket Surgery! by Shannah B Godfrey), that whole-language sight-words are not what
they seem, why continue down that path? Teach your child to read before
kindergarten with The Godfrey Method in A
Merry Child Was Alpha Bette (or A Sunny Kid Was Prince River). Save him or
her from the educational decline. Early reading the right way!
Turning off the TV and teaching
phonics to your child early, the right way, may prevent or reduce dyslexia
(even ADHD & autism). Professor Maggie Snowling of York University (UK)
says the fashionable cures for dyslexia do not really offer a cure for
difficulties with literacy. She said, “As far as I can see, the only effective
treatment for dyslexia in children is a structured phonic program in a
one-on-one situation, backed by confidence-building.” See the dyslexia portions
of articles by:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, June 2004
- University of Washington, Seattle, Dr. Virginia Berninger and Dr. Todd Richards
- University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Professor Carsten Elbro
Note: Speaking vocabulary is the
only place that you don’t want to just “keep it simple.” Studies show that, in
general, dads tend to use bigger words with children than moms, and it helps to
raise their vocabulary. Hearing words often helps children sound them out
easier when reading, and comprehend what they read easier.
http://thegodfreymethod.com/blog/saving-jack-and-jill-11-ways-cure-speech-problems-and-dyslexia