Search This Blog

Sunday, December 29, 2013

3 ways to prevent reading problems before they start

Prevent reading problems before they start! 
  • Never teach the letter names first. Teach only the letter sounds.
  • Never teach sight-reading. Teach only true phonics.
  • Never teach the capital letters first. Teach only the lower-case.
               Byron Harrison and Jean Clyde, who co-authored the insightful book, Reading Through Tears, show without a doubt that neither parents, preschool teachers, nor elementary school teachers should ever teach the letter names first. They should only be taught long after the children have a good grasp of phonics and of blending sounds into syllables and words.
               “We find confusions between [letter] names and sounds to be one of the most common causes of reading errors. It is important simply because it usually undermines a child’s capacity to blend letter sounds together and that then means that the higher order phonic skills also remain unreliable, and if children's phonic skills are unreliable don't be surprised if they revert to inaccurate guessing instead," as the Visual Attention Span (VAS) Theory researchers say.
                "We also find that remediation of name/sound confusions is a surprisingly difficult task even in the hands of a specialist tutor. We therefore must PREVENT these problems before they start.”
                The VAS research website has overwhelming scientific data proving that synthetic [explicit, systematic] phonics is the best and only way to teach reading properly. 
                To quote some of the research by Harrison and Clyde, “Research has clearly demonstrated that at the learning-to-read stage many children are unable to work out for themselves the full range of letter sounds; they need to be specifically taught. Word-guessing not only fails to develop this knowledge, it also wastes time during the critical 6-9 year-old learning period and allows time for confusions between names and sounds to become habituated.
                Visual Attention Span (VAS) Theory reading expert Jean Clyde writes, “Today I saw Adam. He is almost 11, has a shy smile, is a little small for his age and thinks that he is average in reading and a little below average in spelling. However his mother is concerned about the fast approaching problems of Adam's entering high school, a very common concern among parents of 11 year olds! She has been reassured that Adam is progressing satisfactorily but his mother has long ago learned to distrust such [school] assurances.
                He can read one, two and many three syllable words, which is more that many of my other 11 year-olds can do. And yet when I ask Adam to tell me the sounds of letters he shows hesitations and some of the 3-syllable words show evidence of confusions between names and sounds.
                “Adam had originally learned letter names and guessing. He had then struggled to read. He preferred guessing words partly because guessing [seemed] faster, partly because his [elementary] teacher encouraged him to guess, but mainly because his insecure grasp of sounds undermined his confidence.
                “Guessing however is inherently inaccurate. [The next teacher tried but] failed to over-teach [phonics] to the stage where his newly acquired phonic skills became automatic. The phonic skills that he was taught are therefore still insecurely based and guessing still dominates.
                “Knowledge of sounds needs to reach the stage where, when you see a letter, you automatically associate it with its most common sound. Later on you can learn the secondary sounds but if you fail to initially consolidate the basic letter sounds, you may condemn the Adams of this world to being average in reading and below average in spelling when they might have been superior in both!” http://www.vasresearch.com
VAS Theory supports what The Godfrey Method has always said in the "Top Ten Myths of Reading." Doing it right the first time is so much easier!
 
 

Sunday, December 22, 2013

0 (zero) reasons to teach sight-reading

Just say NO to sight-reading. There are 0 (zero) reasons to teach sight-words and sight-reading to hearing children.
                Danielle, a proactive, purposeful parent, told me about teaching her son at home by the accepted, traditional, reading methods – alphabet names, capital letters, sight-reading, etc. Then her child "hit a wall" and she didn’t know how to fix it.
The sight-reading (popular in many preschools) messed up everything she had been trying to teach him. Luckily, she found The Godfrey Method and has been rebuilding his foundation properly for phonics. In her own words:
                "My son, Jaksen, started showing signs of giftedness when he was very young, so my husband and I decided that it was best to nurture this and do what we could to keep him challenged. By the age of 2 he knew all of his letter names, uppercase and lowercase, and his numbers 1-10. He was potty-trained, too.
                “He was doing so well that naturally we thought the next step should be sight-words. Initially it began well, but after about a month or so we noticed that my son was now confusing some of his letters for numbers, such as 9 for P. And he would guess at the words he was seeing and get frustrated very easily. For example, he would see ‘Clairebella’ and say ‘sister’ instead. From this he began to regress. So we stopped doing sight words, but we were unsure where to go next. We hit a wall."
                With The Godfrey Method, Danielle reports that Jaksen now knows all his letter sounds and is reading words already.
                The educational system has been going backwards for several decades, now. Many schools teach sight-reading in kindergarten. Many national-chain preschools teach sight-words. Several commercial, early-reading programs are also based on sight-reading.
As I keep warning, if your baby can read by sight-reading now, he’ll probably struggle with reading as an adult. My co-worker, Dave, was taught to read by the sight-reading method back in the 1940s-50s. He can read functionally but always wrestles with new words. His “Archie Bunker-isms” are hilarious.
                My illustrator, Leah, says, “I have never met a phonics-learner who couldn’t sight-read, but I have met plenty of sight-readers who don’t know how to decode an unfamiliar word. As adults they must often guess and feel embarrassed.” This sad scenario can be prevented by teaching children to read early the right way.
                So when and where do sight-words have a place in learning to read? Sight-reading comes as a natural consequence of sounding-out words. It is never the place to start. When a child has read the word “dog” a few times, s/he will begin to recognize it by sight. But s/he knows what sounds create the word “dog” and understand its left-to-right orientation. Even when sight-reading, children say the sounds in their heads, albeit much faster than before. They will be able to sound-out new or unfamiliar words reasonably well, too.
                I don’t even use the sight-word method with those pesky “platypus” words that don’t seem to follow the rules. Actually, they used to follow the rules, but we changed our pronunciation. Or they follow the rules of a parent-language other than English, and we adopted them. Again, we usually changed the pronunciation to suit us.
                Platypus words will be discussed more at the end of the Appendix of Vol. 3 of my book, It's Not Rocket Surgery!, but suffice it to say that if we pronounce them the way they look, most children will still understand them. We just sound like we’re speaking with a foreign accent. It doesn’t hurt to say, “thē” instead of “thuh.” Nor to say, “sāys” instead of “sez.” Nor “frī-end” instead of “frend.” Saying it the phonetic way before the popular way actually helps children remember the spellings better.
                So when and where does reading by context have a place in learning to read? Never let a child guess at a word by context of the rest of the sentence. Never! The child needs to sound out the word. The only place for using context is with words that have homonyms or alternate spellings, and the reader needs to understand which meaning is used. “The wind was too strong to wind the sail.” For more examples by Sonal Panse, see Spy Code Rule 44 in the Appendix of Vol. 3 of my book, It's Not Rocket Surgery!
 

"That's How the Light Gets In" by Tyler J. Jarvis



http://godfreymethod.com/default.aspx

1 and only prevention and cure for dyslexia

Would you like to know the only known cure for dyslexia?
 
Some people get upset when I tell them that dyslexia is not truly genetic and is preventable or fixable. What wouldn’t you do for your child to cure or prevent dyslexia? Yet this is so easy!
 
While it's true that dyslexia may be genetic or have biological factors, the expression of the genes can be triggered by environmental factors, according to top neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Merzenich and also Dr. Glenn Doman. They can also be healed. Their studies, and many others from neurology and dyslexia research, have proven it.
 
Listen, I'm not blaming you for your child's dyslexia, I'm just trying to help you. But if there's a simple, affordable solution, why do you fight it? Do you actually want it to be harder than it is?
 
Remember the Israelites who refused to look at Moses' brass serpent on the pole to be healed from snake bites? It was too easy to just look, so many refused. They’d rather die than look.
 
There are many good phonics programs out there. Starting with mine just makes learning to read easier and faster. It also repairs speech problems.
 
Project Follow Through (1967-1995) has caused much of the upsurge in dyslexia, too, because we got away from phonics and have been teaching sight-reading, whole language, child-led discovery, self-esteem (without skills), and a whole bunch of other things that improperly wire the brain to prevent efficient, maximum reading capability.
 
The effects of PFT are still with us, because the faulty teaching models/theories are still being pushed.
 
I have oodles and oodles of information for this, discussed in Vol. 4 of my book, It's Not Rocket Surgery! Let it suffice that there are a lot of misinformed ideas about dyslexia.
Part of the reason for this is that the government has spent millions on studies trying to prove that dyslexia is genetic, to justify what it has done to education. However, I have researched many more studies that prove it is not.
 
Dyslexia is an induced disease, induced by sight-reading methods. True, it may have some biological components, but these are easily healed with direct phonics instruction. Yes, the brain can be re-wired properly! More on this later.
 
                The only proven cure for dyslexia is one-on-one phonics instruction. You need to start over and re-wire your child's brain with A Funny Boy Was Prince River, found on www.amazon.com. Pay close attention to the guidelines for teaching these unique picture-letters. The method is very important.
 
                “Also, if your child feels "baby-ish" starting over with letter sounds, have her teach it to a younger child. She'll let you teach her so that she can teach a pre-schooler. Then she feels successful and they both benefit. This is seriously the best thing parents can do at home!!!”
 
 
 
 
                Actually, there is a cure. See all the references in these articles above ...
 
                Did you look at the reference websites for dyslexia? Did you read all three articles? I am a scientist and a researcher, and my information came from dyslexia sites, scientific studies, and my own research. One-on-one phonics will heal dyslexia.
 
It's been proven, and as a scientist, I always go with the data. Reason over rhetoric; data over dogma.
 
Good luck on your journey.
 
 

Saturday, December 7, 2013

3 reasons why schools are failing in reading

Why aren’t all schools using the best reading method ever (phonics)?
        Did you know that teaching children to read by sight-word methods (look-say, whole-word, your-baby-can-read) -
  • can lower their IQ? 
  • can cause dyslexia?
  • is the main reason that our educational system has been on the decline for several decades, now?
       Why would schools want to teach gifted and normal children to read like defective children?! Again I say, "If your baby can read by sight-words now, s/he may struggle with reading as an adult!"
        Here is an article showcasing several interviews on Oprah that show the public school statistics, and they're not pretty. Even private schools or home schools that use the sight-reading method can set children back for years, often unrecoverably.
        A majority of U.S. schools are firmly entrenched in the sight-reading and discovery methods that don’t work. They bought into the propaganda of Frank Smith and others, then legislated it into law.
       But I believe in reason over rhetoric; data over dogma. The educational world’s theories FAIL under the rigors of scientific proof (so they ignore the proof)!
        A research team headed by scientists from the esteemed Yale School of Medicine announced in 2004 a particularly significant finding for children who have trouble learning to read. It was reported by Gilbert Zarate in the Brownsville Herald:
        In the words of the reporter:
        “The study reported that [with MRI scans] the brain function of poor readers actually changes to resemble the brain function of “good” readers when they have been taught to read through instruction that is direct, systematic, and focuses on the sounds and letters that make up words, the meanings of words, and helping children read accurately and quickly.
        “We know that reading instruction for struggling readers must be explicit, systematic, and allow sufficient time for student learning. We also know that the reading curriculum should include the five critical components that are fundamental to learning to read — phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and reading comprehension.”
        The focus of this study, as much of the writing on this topic, is on how to assist struggling readers. While struggling readers show us what the critical issues are, the children who are not struggling are able to learn much more, much quicker, if they are also given exposure to the best teaching practices.
        Unfortunately, as is commonly the case, teachers leave good students to fend for themselves on the mistaken assumption that they don’t need help. Mom and Dad can and should do things at home to enhance their child’s learning and intelligence.
        So if the scientific evidence strongly proves that phonics instruction re-maps the brain for the better, why does the educational establishment, for the most part, continue to ignore the data and teach ineffective reading (and math) methods?
  • Part of the answer may be found in the lobbying and monetary influence of textbook publishers, who follow fads for personal gain, rather than true research results.
  • Part of the answer may be found in the egos of some university, educational professors pushing their own theories and agendas.
  • Part of the answer can be found in the inertia and ennui of large government entities and schools to resist change.
        Whatever the factors, it is clear that parents must not let their children be left to fend for themselves in school. Parents can follow the best practices of phonics reading instruction (and direct math instruction) with their children at home to ensure a great foundation for success.
        A few teachers (but not all) have admitted to my friend, Joan, that they’re only in that profession for the 3-month, summer break. In 2010, the Kansas City school district scored lowest in the state of Missouri. Schools across the nation are struggling similarly. This may be a combination of faulty PFT teaching models, faulty PFT curriculum laws, disinterested parents, apathetic teachers, and/or traumatized children. Early reading the right way could help prevent this sad scenario.
        A young mother herself, Chauntel, told me about having a mother who didn't prepare her for school, nor helped with learning or homework after school ("the schools will do it..."). Her mom’s lack of involvement affected Chauntel’s education and self-worth. Going to Job Corps for high school helped her turn her life around. She now uses The Godfrey Method with her children and is a proactive parent. “To a child, love is spelled, T-I-M-E”www.simpletruths.com
        Eleanor, a college instructor, recently told me of Nevada state laws passed to test only the bright school children for "no child left behind." Only 40% of the state's children can actually pass the testing, so most of the children are not tested, to keep the state scores looking good. Her son was on the ‘approved’ testing list because of his good grades (she has always supplemented his education at home). What a dishonest travesty for our children!
        Eleanor has also seen the affects of PFT’s teaching-model failures in her unprepared college students. She has to do a lot of remediation in the basics before she can actually teach her classes. Many of these students can only read simple words and sentences, and can’t study more than ten minutes, if at all. More and more students are entering college without good basic skills in reading, writing, and math, yet they want to be nurses, etc., so we lower the standards. Scary. Would you want a nurse who learned from lower standards to work on you?
        One man, Mathew, pointed out how many of our historical leaders had no more than a 5th-grade education, yet their letters and writings show perfect sentence structure and grammar. Obviously their level of 5th-grade education was far beyond ours now!
        Many young people now can’t read classic books from the past, such as Pride and Prejudice or Wuthering Heights, etc., because they don’t have enough sight-words memorized to cover old English style, and they can’t sound the words out, either. Instead, we dumb-down the classics into movies like Clueless, which is a fitting title. They would never be able to read or understand an ingenious book like Barbara Kingsolver’s, The Poisonwood Bible! Such a loss of collective national intellect!
       Mathew also told about being taught the "Inventive Spelling" method used in his elementary school, which let children write and spell however they wanted, without correction or spelling rules. It was a struggle for him to fix later, but he brought himself up to speed in high school with a lot of effort. The other children in his class may not have been so motivated. Such confusion actually lowers a child’s self-esteem. Spelling properly is very important, especially if you want to be taken seriously.
        Mathew’s experience reminded me of my friend Iona in Arizona in the 1970s. As a child, her elementary and elsewhere wanted to ‘clean up’ spelling by having similar sounds spelled the same, such as bite and lite. (She never did figure out how to spell properly.) The schools unofficially ‘standardized,’ or changed, the spelling of many words. While this sounds great in theory, it didn’t prepare the children for dealing with the real world. The movement didn’t stick, messed up decades of children, and has been tried again later, too.
        Understanding the phonics rules, as given in the appendix, helps most children become excellent spellers without any need for “reform” methods. I’m so glad that my school teachers corrected my spelling. The corrections stuck in my brain and boosted my self-esteem with accomplishment! Don’t expect spell-checker to do it for you, either. I’ve found many mistakes and misunderstandings in spell-checker suggestions.
        Government studies have shown that a tutor only needs 1½ hours per week to catch a sick student up with his school class. That’s about 20 minutes a day vs. 6 hours in school. Hartman Rector, Jr., claims that only 14 minutes a day with mom is worth more than 6 hours with a teacher. You are your child’s best teacher. She learns faster from mom or dad than others.
        What are the 2 most crucial things, beyond the basics, that children need? – parent time and reading skills. One mom, Simcah, says that helping her kids learn their picture-letter phonics cards and reading stories are her favorite ways to spend time with them. It’s a wonderful way to bond and she loves to see their faces light up as they catch on.
        Simcah has also said, “My 3-year-old son loves your phonics cards! He already knows all his letter sounds! This book [A Pretty Girl Was Alpha Bette] comes with the best phonics cards ever. My kids love the cards, and the instructions for teaching beginners are invaluable. I also love that the phonics letters are in the text of the story book, which teaches the kids to start looking at the text for the letters they know. The illustrations are beautiful and my kids love seeing the letters they know in the pictures on the page, too.”
        Olivia, a young girl in first grade, had a teacher who said she just couldn’t focus and because of this, she could not learn. The teacher wanted her parents to put her on ADHD meds! Her mom knew that Olivia behaved just fine at home. She decided to use TGM phonics at home instead, and Olivia took off with reading. She’s not ADHD at all. She was just bored! The school’s methods weren’t keeping her interest, which was killing her love of reading.
        There is hope! The Godfrey Method stresses the importance of teaching letter sounds, NOT letter names, as you know by now. This is one of the key basics for preparing children for school. The teachers may disagree.
        Olivia could read before kindergarten, clearly gifted, but her mother had wisely never taught her the letter names. The teacher thought the child was failing because she said the sound- instead of the name- of each letter. What a joke. The failure here was the training of the teacher, as well as the public school system which measures such silly markers of ‘success.’ How can a child read and still fail ‘reading?’ Only in a state-mandated curriculum!
You, mom and dad, are the key. It's not rocket surgery!

Saturday, November 30, 2013

23 ways phonics is the best practice of millenia

Let's discuss the next building blocks for your child, using the best practice of millennia - phonics
                Ask yourself - Why do those who are taught to read phonetically never become dyslexic? But those who read ideographically (by sight-words) do? A phonetic reader cannot become dyslexic.
That’s proof enough that dyslexia is not truly genetic, and that it's preventable and curable.
All change is not progress. If it isn't broken, don't fix it. Stay with phonics!
Five simple ways parents can avoid paying for remediation later, and how you can, too:
  • Read to your infant/toddler/preschooler daily, often while holding or sitting next to him/her. Avoid electronic reading methods, which dampen bonding.
  • Introduce The Godfrey Method picture-letter phonics-cards, as found in A Funny Boy Was Prince River, as early as possible, easily giving your child the first 26 sounds. Preschool is not the answer.
  • Help your child learn to write the letters, and later words, as taught in this book, especially in the Volume 1 & 2 Home Early Learning Play School (HELPS) of It's Not Rocket Surgery!
  • Help your child to read before kindergarten age, using the words and spelling rules in this INRS appendix. Avoid the top ten myths of reading, outlined in Volume 2.
  • Let your child “catch” you reading. Show your enjoyment. Go to the library regularly.
My colleague, Donna, told me that her son’s elementary school in Michigan taught reading with a child-led “discovery” system that did not teach the spelling rules of phonics. The teachers didn’t want to ‘hurt’ the kids’ self-esteems with corrections, and let them write however they wanted. But that’s exactly what they did – hurt self-esteem. Being unable to read or write well shakes a child’s confidence to the core. And it gets worse each year.
Several years later, Donna had to go to the junior high for a conference for her son. While there, she heard several mothers talking about having to take their young teens to Sylvan Learning Center® for tutoring because they were so far behind.
One mother was especially angry, not only because she had to pay for Sylvan’s tutoring, but while there, she heard the registrar say, “We see this all the time. We have a lot of junior high students coming to us because of how they were taught in elementary.”
That mom was furious! She had to pay to remedy how the school messed up her son! Sadly, the elementary is still teaching the faulty theory even after years of proven failure. (What I want to know is, why aren’t schools beating down the doors of Sylvan Learning Center® to find out how to teach correctly? Obviously the knowledge is out there.) Let's look at the history of sight-reading versus phonics -
The best practice of millennia - phonics:
  1. ~2001 B.C. - Writing is done with complex hieroglyphics, keeping literacy available only to a small class of scholars, scribes, and priests. It was cumbersome and required memorizing thousands of pictographs.
  2. ~2000 B.C. - The first alphabet was invented in Phoenicia (south Lebanon & north Israel area). This remarkable discovery gave man an accurate, precise means of translating spoken words into writing. It was the most revolutionary invention in all history. It required learning only 42 sounds. It accelerated the speed and availability of intellectual development to the whole population.
  3. 1783 - Noah Webster produced near-universal literacy with his phonetic American Spelling Book and other spellers like it. From 1783 to 1826, Webster's brilliant sound-method speller was unfailingly successful in curing the "disease" of illiteracy.
  4. 1826 - A movement to promote reading by "meaning" instead of "sound" began on both sides of the Atlantic. The first two sight-word primers emerged, Franklin Primer and Worcester's. Spelling books (phonetic) were omitted for the first time ever. Astonishingly spread and infiltrated by only 1830.
  5. 1830 - Rev. Thomas H. Gallaudet invented the sight method for deaf children, using pictures with words - and using words as pictures (hieroglyphics). Published it in the American Annals of Education.
  6. 1836 - Gallaudet published The Mother's Primer based on his look-say method. Predictably, reading and spelling disabilities exploded in the wake of the "improvements" of the know-nothings who were oblivious to history.
  7. 1837 - Horace Mann of the Boston Primary School Committee adopts the above primer for Massachusetts. Educational "reformers" of that time were against anything they considered old orthodox, including phonics.
  8. 1844 - The defects of Gallaudet's look-say primer are very apparent to Boston schoolmasters, who issued a blistering attack against it. These defects were recognized by educators who were not seduced by the siren songs of the reformers.
  9. 1912 - Myrtle Sholty published her study in Elementary School Teacher, which showed that sight-reading produced impaired, subjective readers who guessed at words, omitted words, inserted words, substituted words, and mutilated words.
  10. 1914 - Psychologist Walter F. Dearborn reviewed Sholty's study and admitted that sight-readers are more likely to misread because of the large apperceptive element they supply to their reading. Despite this, top psychologists proceeded to devise and publish look-say textbooks based on this very defective methodology.
  11. 1929 - Dr. Samuel T. Orton, a neuropathologist in Iowa, concluded from his research that children's reading problems were caused not by their neurology, but by a new sight-reading method. Results of his research were published in the Journal of Educational Psychology.
  12. 1956 - Rudolf Flesch's article, Why Johnny Can't Read, was published in a newspaper.
  13. 1967 - Project Follow Through begins, giving us 21 faulty teaching models that still persist. Government funded this for 28 years, into the billions.
  14. 1973 - The New Illiterates was published, showing that the chief, and perhaps only, cause of dyslexia is sight-reading.
  15. 1981 - The 1920s Dewey revolt against phonics eventually led Dr. Seuss' publisher to insist that he write sight-word books from the first grade word list. Hence, The Cat in the Hat. Dr. Seuss later said, "I think killing phonics was one of the greatest causes of illiteracy in the country."
  16. 1984 - Samuel Blumenfeld's book, NEA, quotes Russian psychologists, Luna and Pavlov, who devised an artificial way of including behavioral disorganization by introducing two conflicting stimuli to the organism. Sight-reading does this to children.
  17. 1985 - In Reading Without Nonsense, Frank Smith is responsible for the misconception of the century, promoting sight-reading. His book, Understanding Reading, became the bible of whole-language educators.
  18. 1987 - The federal government has spent- and is still spending- millions of dollars looking for the genetic causes of dyslexia. There is something insidious in this. A total waste - there aren't any. The children are phonetically impaired by their pre-school learning of a sight vocabulary.
  19. 1989 - Edward Miller devised a scientific test which clearly indicated whether a child was a sight-reader or a phonetic-reader, and at what point the child's reading mode became permanent. (Phonetic readers were usually taught by their parents.)
  20. 1990s - Edward Miller went to great lengths to bring his findings to the government education and research establishment, to no avail. They are not interested. They have their own agenda, and it has nothing to do with educational excellence.
  21. 1992 - Samuel Blumenfeld states, "Our only hope is to reach enough parents so that as many children as possible can be saved from the fate of functional illiteracy the public schools have in store for them... This will immunize children against dyslexia."
  22. 2004 - Geraldine E. Rodgers writes an article, "Why Noah Webster's Way Was the Right Way." She proves, "Teaching the reading of alphabetic print by its "sound" is the correct way. Teaching the reading of alphabetic print by its "meaning" is the incorrect way." And "If [the two methods] are mixed, then the mixture is incorrect in direct proportion to the emphasis given to the "meaning" method."
  23. 2008 - Shannah B Godfrey publishes, A Funny Boy Was Prince River, to empower parents and children to reverse the educational trend for themselves. Phonics before kindergarten age is our best hope for the future. (Actually A Pretty Girl Was Alpha Bette was first, but I prefer my Funny River version.)
                Most of this information comes from the writings of Samuel Blumenfeld and others, posted on Don Potter's wonderful blog:http://www.donpotter.net/ed.htm
 
http://thegodfreymethod.com/blog/open-world-23-ways-phonics-best-practice-millenia